Feeds:
Posts
Comments

One of those Facebook trends is going around wherein everyone’s writing quizzes to find out how well other people “really” know them. As of yet, I haven’t scored 100% on any of these and the only person to score 100% on mine was my husband–I tried to make mine easy. It’s easy to feel down about these things. “Crap. Do I really know anyone? Does anyone really know me?”

What is a good indication of what it means to “know” me or to know the others in my life?

I often tell Eric “I know you.” These words are used to explain how I know he’s had a bad day or that he’s frustrated or that he’s ready to go home from a party or even that he’s hungry. He repeats the same phrase to me quite often too. Eric and I work. My relationship with him is by far the most rewarding and meaningful relationship I have. We’ve been married for nearly four years now. Now, looking at our relationship, I understand what it meant when, at our wedding, our pastor discussed that “two were becoming one.” I understand him and when I’m not being selfish, I can often anticipate his needs and desires. I know him.

But what of relationships outside of romantic partnership? Those who we don’t “know” in the biblical sense? How do we know that we know someone? What does it mean, in that context to “know” someone?

It seems in the age of Facebook we’ve equated closeness in relationships to the memorization of trivial facts. We seem to feel valued if and only if people have chosen to fill their brains with mundane factoids about our existence.

It’s like establishing your “Indie Cred” when you’re standing in line to attend a concert. Go stand in any queue outside a local independent music venue and you’ll inevitably hear conversation bites (or 5) that go roughly like this:

Speaker 1: “Man, I can’t believe it’s been [insert number between 1-9] years since I’ve seen [insert relevant band name] live.”

Speaker 2: “I bet they’ll open up with [insert obscure song from least popular album].”

Speaker 1: “They recently got a new [insert instrument] player because the old one [choose one of the following: joined a new band; died; found Jesus].”

Speaker 3: “[Insert first name only of lead singer] is such an inspirational modern day poet.”

You get the point. Almost everyone stands around spewing factoids in an effort to sound interesting and hip. They attempt to assure everyone close by that they know as much as everyone else. No one is talking to the person or persons they’re with, really. Instead, they’re justifying their presence at the show, proving their fandom.

Soon, however, the concert will begin and the truth will be revealed. Some of those same chatterboxes will leave early. Some will boo the very bands their esteemed band of choice has chosen to tour with. Some will become so occupied by the way others in the crowd treat them that the music will no longer be their focus. Some will become so drunk it’s hard to believe they’ll remember how to get home, much less how the show went. Some will sing only to the hits and simply sway through the more obscure tunes.

Others, perhaps those more quiet in line, know that concerts are messy and sometimes uncomfortable, but will still stay put until the house lights come on and the room begins to empty. Others will lose themselves in the moment and not even notice the hair from the person in front of them that tickles their face or the elbow or oversized pocketbook bruising their ribs. They’ll keep smiling even as the tall person steps in front of them and blocks their view; it’s about the sound, after all. Still others will sing loud and proud every lyric, even though their voice is shameful and their throat aches from distress.

One person can easily find themselves in one of the above groups one night and in the opposite on another or even during a different moment in the show. The facts they can cite about the band matter little, after all, they can come, as mine often do, from a Google search moments before leaving for the concert. What truly matters is how they experience and interact with the music in the moment.

The facts about me can be learned by those who happens to request access to them via Facebook–and I’m not particularly picky about this “friending” business. But will those requesters stay with me until the house lights come on?

I posted an update to my “Read 52 This Year Blog” allowing myself to admit that I was way behind on my goal to read a total of 52 books this year.  I’m 15 books behind.  I also haven’t updated here in quite some time.  As I’m sitting here writing I’m reminded of the fact that I also haven’t worked out on the elliptical machine today.  I also badly need to repaint my toenails.  I need to spend some time writing…and researching.  I need to update my syllabi for Fall and revise my hybrid course.  I need to finish up grading for a class that ends next Monday.  There’s just so much to do.  Maybe the next book on my to read list should address time management–how to get everything you want to accomplish done; how to prioritize; how to multitask.  I’ve even tried forgoing sleep…and still there are just not enough hours in the day.

But, truth be told…I’d be miserable if I wasn’t so busy!  No idle hands here…

One thing I hate about being home sick is that the quality of daytime television has really gone down hill. I remember when I was a kid I used to watch a number of morning cartoons and then the Price is Right in the afternoon. Somehow watching Bob Barker made everything seem okay. I also remember watching the Whammy and shows like the Facts of Life. These shows were great at keeping my interest and helping me forget about how terrible I might feel.

Today, however, I’ve been home with the flu, trying to get rest on the couch and struggling to find something worth watching. I found an episode of Scrubs, but since I’ve seen every Scrubs episode ever made many times, I hardly found it entertaining. So I decided to flip on the CW to see what was happening there.

At first there was some type of TV Court show. I don’t remember which Judge was on, but I know it wasn’t Judy. I watched for a few minutes and was struck by how judgmental and confrontational the judge was. I know her goal is to make a judgement about the case, but there seemed to be a number of comments directed simply at the character of the parties involved in the case. These comments were merely seated in assumptions based on stereotypes. While the case was interesting, the presenting of evidence was painful and the attitude of all parties was obnoxious. Why do people watch these shows, I wondered? Still, rather than changing the channel, I decided to leave it on that show as I took a nap. When I awoke, The Steve Wilkos Show was on.

I’ve seen my share of daytime talk shows, but this one really unsettling. It was one of these episodes where one person accuses another of something terrible and they spend the episode talking about how awful that person is since they did this terrible thing (that no one has proof of). Then, at the end, they reveal the results of a lie detection test and further villainize that one person. The audience joins in the hatred of this one person and everyone but the host is painted as either evil, stupid or irrational.

I used to catch one of these shows from time to time when I was younger, but they seemed much different then. Tamer, perhaps. For one, the hosts in the past seemed hesitant to cast judgement on any person until we all heard the facts. On this show, we had Steve Wilkos belittling people left and right. He actually called one guy a rat at the end–saying that he saw him in a gutter and almost stepped on him.

Fighting and yelling seem commonplace on these shows now. I remember this behavior was once thought to be outlandish and so inappropriate that Jerry Springer was considered controversial and only aired at night.

Yet this is taking place during the middle of the day and what’s more is that there seem to be versions of this crap on every channel I look at. All of these shows seems terribly scripted to me and I wonder if any of these people are remotely “real” or whether it’s all just acting.

Even more, I wonder why they are so popular? Why do people watch them? Clearly, I watched an entire episode of the Steve Wilkos Show today, but why? I found it distasteful and fake, yet I stayed on the channel long enough to find out if the father had “really” molested his daughter. Why?

It’s not just the CW either. Right now every channel we have (and we don’t have cable) except PBS either has a daytime talk show of this caliber, a TV court show, or a daytime soap opera.
What happened to shows like The Facts of Life and the Price is Right? When did overdramatized, interpersonal squabbles become the only facts of life we’re interested in?

Will the next generation have nostalgic memories not of the soothing voice of Bob Barker, but instead of the judgmental accusations of Steve Wilkos?

Older Posts »